The Pronunciation of <'> Saul Epstein Fri, 24 Oct 1997 11:26:18 -0500 I just happened to be visiting headquarters over Marketa's way and noticed a very interesting document called "More on Vulcan." For instance... The name of the planet is W~L'q'n, where "w~l" is a nearly voiceless latero-bilabial fricative.... The original form of the name of the planet is, historically, "wellequanno", a compound of "welle > w~l plus quanno > q'n. the modern Vucaln "W~l" developed from "welle", i,e. semi-voiced bilabial fricative "w" followed by "e" , a sound as in standard English final wovel in word like "teacher" etc. followed by long lateral "ll" followed again by "e". Since some Vulcans still pronounce the name of their planet in a more 'archaic' manner, it may SOUND to our ear as a sequence of [w^l-] or [val-], and hence the usual transcription "Vulcan". If I understand this correctly, an earlier form of the language we're dealing with contained a compound which the ZC would render as , and from which the modern derives. If the "experience" of this word is typical, it supports my suspicion that /'/, while we may classify it as a phoneme, actually represents historical segments that have been reduced as far as possible toward zero. In the case of "w^ll^quanno," ALL the vowels have been reduced to zero, and syllabic consonants (/w~l/ and /n/) have been employed to keep the word from collapsing altogether. The only use this information has, besides illuminating the nature of Vulcan etymology, is to shed light on possible allophones of /'/. /'/ -> ['](glottal stop)/V_ (after a vowel) [0](zero)/C[+syllabic]_;_C[+syllabic] after or before a syllabic consonant [^](mid-central vowel, VERY short)/elsewhere This probably doesn't matter to anyone else, but it makes ME a lot more comfortable with the current distribution of <'> in the lexicon. -- from Saul Epstein liberty uit net www johnco cc ks us sepstein "Surak ow'pha:per the's'hi the's'cha'; the's'pha:dzhar the's'hi surakecha'." -- K'dvarin Ursw~l'at